In a significant development within Australia’s mining sector, South32 ADR (OTCMKTS: SOUHY), a prominent diversified miner, has initiated legal proceedings against battery metals producer IGO Ltd.(OTCMKTS: IPGD).
The lawsuit, amounting to A$122.1 million ($80.17 million), centers on alleged unpaid royalties related to the Tropicana gold mine in Western Australia. South32 claims that IGO owes an outstanding 1.5% soil sample royalty payment on the gross revenue generated from the mine between December 2014 and September 2023.
The crux of the legal dispute stems from a longstanding agreement dating back to 2002 between South32 and IGO. Additionally, this agreement entitled South32 to royalty payments if minerals were discovered from soil samples collected under specific exploration licenses.
Furthermore, South32 contends that IGO’s utilization of soil samples led to the discovery of gold in areas encompassed by the licenses. This ultimately culminated in the establishment of the Tropicana mine.
In response to South32’s allegations, IGO vehemently denies any liability. The company asserts that the preconditions for royalty entitlement outlined in the agreement have not been fulfilled. Moreover, IGO clarifies that it divested its stake in the Tropicana project to Regis Resources Ltd. (OTCMKTS: RGRNF) in May 2021 and no longer maintains an active interest in the venture.
Notably, IGO holds an indemnity from Regis, which potentially covers a portion of the claimed amount estimated at up to A$40 million. This indemnity pertains to any royalty obligations arising from May 2021 onward. Additionally, it offers financial protection for IGO against potential royalty obligations from that period.
Read more: Uranium prices set to rally as top producer faces production snag
Read more: New Found Gold intercepts high grade gold assays in Newfoundland
Stance and strategy amid legal battle: IGO and Regis stand firm
Regis Resources, the current proprietor of the Tropicana project, has issued a firm statement supporting IGO’s position. The company asserts that no outstanding amounts are owed under the Royalty Agreement for the current operational activities at the mine. Both IGO and Regis are resolute in defending against South32’s claims. They are ready to take appropriate measures to safeguard their respective interests.
Furthermore, the timing of the lawsuit is noteworthy, coinciding with operational challenges faced by IGO in its other ventures. The recent decision to place its Cosmos nickel project in Western Australia into care and maintenance highlights the broader financial context of this legal battle. It reflects the financial challenges facing the company amidst ongoing legal proceedings. Additionally, the downward revision of its annual lithium production forecast contributes to this perspective.
Despite these challenges, the potential indemnity coverage from Regis offers IGO some financial reassurance as it prepares for a rigorous legal defense against South32. This indemnity provides a buffer against the financial pressures stemming from the ongoing legal dispute.
As South32 and IGO embark on this legal battle, the ramifications extend beyond the courtroom, impacting Australia’s mining landscape. The repercussions of this dispute resonate throughout the industry, influencing stakeholders and operations alike. The outcome of the dispute will have immediate financial implications for the involved parties.
Additionally, it will set a precedent for the interpretation and enforcement of royalty agreements within the industry. Against the backdrop of operational hurdles and legal uncertainties, both South32 and IGO remain steadfast in their pursuit of resolution.
zartasha@mugglehead.com
