U.S. senators negotiating rules for stablecoin yield are close to releasing compromise text this week, even as banking groups resist key provisions.
Lawmakers said on Tuesday they have spent months debating whether crypto platforms can pay yield to stablecoin holders. The issue has stalled the broader Clarity Act, which aims to define digital asset rules.
Sen. Thom Tillis said negotiators expect to publish draft language soon. Additionally, he confirmed talks with Sen. Angela Alsobrooks have narrowed differences. Tillis said progress has come on anti-evasion measures, while enforcement details remain unresolved. However, he suggested some criticism reflects stakeholders not seeing the full proposal.
The dispute centers on whether exchanges can offer yield through rewards programs tied to stablecoins. These programs resemble interest payments and have become a major draw for users. Meanwhile, the American Bankers Association has pushed back against the proposal. The group criticized a White House economic analysis that minimized risks to traditional lenders.
The Council of Economic Advisers report found banning yield would only raise bank lending by about 0.02 per cent. Additionally, the analysis used the current USD$300 billion stablecoin market as its baseline.
Banking groups argue that approach ignores future growth. They warn the market could expand to between USD$1 trillion and USD$2 trillion if yield becomes widespread. Consequently, banks say the potential impact on deposits and lending could be much larger. They view yield-bearing stablecoins as direct competition for customer funds.
The legislative timeline has added urgency to negotiations. Lawmakers have warned the bill must pass by May or risk stalling before midterm elections.
Read more: Kraken sticks with IPO plans despite USD$6.7B valuation drop
Read more: World Liberty Financial mints USD$25M in stablecoins after loan repayment claims
Outcomes involve how exchanges structure rewards programs
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also urged lawmakers to finalize the framework. He criticized crypto firms that oppose compromise, calling their stance unproductive.
The outcome could directly affect how exchanges structure rewards programs. For example, Coinbase Global Inc (NASDAQ: COIN) currently offers yield on stablecoin balances through partnerships. Additionally, its arrangement with Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL) allows users to earn roughly 4 per cent annually on holdings. Any restrictions could force changes to those offerings.
Industry advocates say the broader bill still enjoys bipartisan support. They argue lawmakers want clear rules to support innovation and protect consumers. Furthermore, some analysts believe the White House findings weaken claims that stablecoin yield threatens banks. They say the projected lending impact appears minimal.
However, banking groups continue to challenge that view. They argue the analysis does not reflect how quickly digital assets can scale. Some policy experts expect a compromise that limits how yield is offered. For instance, lawmakers may allow activity-based rewards while restricting passive interest payments.
Additionally, regulators could require stricter oversight of how platforms distribute yield. That approach would attempt to balance innovation with financial stability concerns. Still, there remains a risk that lawmakers prohibit yield entirely. Such a move could prompt exchanges to reject the final legislation.
Consequently, the debate has shifted beyond economics toward competition between banks and crypto firms. Each side is positioning for control over customer deposits and financial services. Observers also warn of global implications. They say restrictive U.S. rules could push users and liquidity to other jurisdictions.
Meanwhile, other markets already allow yield-bearing stablecoins under varying regulatory frameworks. That reality adds pressure on U.S. lawmakers to strike a workable balance.
.
