Talks to combine Rio Tinto Group (NYSE: RIO) (ASX: RIO) and Glencore PLC (LON: GLEN) collapsed after the companies failed to agree on terms they believed would benefit shareholders.
The Anglo-Australian miner said on Monday that it stopped considering a merger or similar transaction after determining no value-creating agreement was possible. Glencore, however, rejected the proposed structure more forcefully, arguing it materially undervalued its contribution.
Additionally, the company said the framework failed to recognise the scale of its copper assets and future growth pipeline.
The discussions, confirmed publicly in January, explored an all-share transaction.
That deal would have combined parts, or potentially all, of both mining groups. Consequently, the merged company would have carried a market capitalisation above USD$200 billion. However, negotiations fell apart at a UK regulatory deadline.
Under British takeover rules, Rio Tinto had to submit a firm offer or withdraw.
The company chose to step away before the cutoff. As a result, it is now barred from making another bid for six months unless regulators grant special permission. Meanwhile, the collapse marked the third failed effort in two decades to unite the two rivals.
Governance and ownership issues sat at the centre of the dispute. Rio Tinto proposed a structure allowing it to retain both chairman and chief executive positions. Additionally, the proposal allocated equity stakes that Glencore viewed as inadequate.
Glencore’s board concluded the transaction did not reflect long-term relative value. Furthermore, executives argued the structure discounted the durability of copper demand. They also said the proposal ignored the company’s pipeline of expansion projects. Consequently, the board decided the deal did not serve shareholder interests.
Read more: NevGold expands high grade antimony discovery at Nevada’s Limousine Butte Project
Read more: NevGold targets U.S. critical mineral supply chain with new antimony gold find
Cobalt and copper remain central to energy transition tech
The breakdown carries broader implications beyond corporate strategy. It also affects Africa, where both companies operate major mining assets. Those assets supply metals essential for clean energy systems. Additionally, they support electric vehicles and advanced electronics manufacturing.
Copper and cobalt remain central to energy transition technologies. Africa hosts some of the world’s richest deposits of both metals. Consequently, global miners increasingly view the region as strategically critical. However, political and regulatory risks continue to complicate large-scale transactions.
Glencore’s most valuable African assets sit in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The company controls Mutanda Mining and Kamoto Copper Company in Lualaba province. Those operations rank among the world’s most significant copper and cobalt producers. Additionally, they anchor Glencore’s long-term growth strategy.
Glencore also owns Mopani Copper Mines in Zambia. The asset includes underground mines, processing facilities, and a refinery. Furthermore, Mopani strengthens the company’s position in the Copperbelt region. That area remains one of Africa’s most productive mining zones.
Investor interest in these assets is intensifying. Glencore is in discussions to sell a minority stake in its Congo operations. Specifically, the company is negotiating a 40 per cent sale. Additionally, the potential buyer is the Orion Critical Minerals Consortium.
The U.S.-backed group includes Orion Resource Partners and the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation. The proposed transaction carries an estimated value of about USD$9 billion. Consequently, it could become one of the largest U.S. mining investments in Congo in nearly a decade. It would also signal deeper Western involvement in African critical minerals.
Read more: NevGold’s latest discovery represents near term antimony production potential
Read more: NevGold Corp. advances toward gold-antimony resource with expanded Nevada drilling
China dominates the world’s processing capacity
Western governments increasingly treat mineral supply chains as strategic assets. China dominates much of the world’s processing capacity. However, policymakers in the United States and Europe seek diversification. Additionally, securing upstream resources has become a priority.
The failed Rio-Glencore talks unfolded amid broader consolidation in mining. Earlier, Anglo American (LON: AAL) completed a major deal with Teck Resources (NYSE: TECK). That USD$53 billion transaction created one of the world’s largest copper producers. Consequently, investors expected further mega-mergers across the sector.
Scale offers cost savings and portfolio balance. However, large mergers also invite regulatory scrutiny.
They also raise complex governance questions. In this case, governance disagreements proved decisive.
Rio Tinto said it could not agree on terms delivering sufficient value. Consequently, it formally withdrew from the process. The company did not indicate whether it would revisit talks later. Meanwhile, takeover rules restrict any immediate return to negotiations. Glencore emphasised the strength of its standalone business model. The company pointed to its diversified commodities exposure. Additionally, it cited streamlined operations and a global marketing network.
Management said those strengths support long-term value creation.
Executives reiterated commitments to operational targets through 2026. They also referenced organic growth already underway. Consequently, Glencore framed the decision as disciplined capital management. The company said it remains focused on execution rather than scale alone.
.
