Fears that quantum computing could one day crack bitcoin’s cryptography are driving a new effort to test whether the world’s largest cryptocurrency can survive a post quantum future.
As researchers warn that quantum machines may mature within the next decade, BTQ Technologies Corp (NASDAQ: BTQ) (OTCMKTS: BTQQF) has launched what it calls the first permissionless, quantum resistant bitcoin fork testnet. Released on Monday, the project aims to move the debate beyond speculation and into hands on experimentation.
Media narratives often portray quantum computing as an existential threat to cryptocurrencies. The concern is that once quantum hardware reaches scale, today’s encryption will fail rapidly. Consequently, digital assets frequently appear as the most vulnerable targets. The reasoning centres on speed. Quantum processors exploit quantum mechanics to perform certain calculations exponentially faster than classical chips. As a result, cryptographic systems that depend on computation time for security face long term risk.
However, cryptographers argue that the situation is more complex than “instant collapse.” In addition, several mitigation strategies already exist, even if they introduce substantial tradeoffs. Bitcoin sits at the centre of that discussion. The roughly USD$2 trillion network relies on public key cryptography and proof-of-work mining to secure transactions. Meanwhile, its security assumptions rest on the difficulty of specific mathematical problems.
BTQ’s new initiative, called Bitcoin Quantum, seeks to stress test those assumptions. The company describes it as a public, runnable network that mirrors bitcoin while replacing vulnerable cryptography with post quantum alternatives. According to BTQ, the testnet allows miners, developers, researchers, and users to experiment today. Additionally, it includes a block explorer and a mining pool, providing immediate accessibility.
Read more: Ghana’s crypto green light meets real-world Bitcoin adoption
Read more: Ripple gains regulatory clearance to boost crypto payments in Singapore
Quantum computing threatens bitcoin’s security
Chris Tam, BTQ’s head of quantum innovation, said the goal is preparation rather than alarm. He said the network exists to surface real world performance and cost issues before any urgent migration becomes unavoidable. Quantum computing threatens bitcoin through two primary attack vectors. First, a powerful quantum computer could derive a private key from a public key. Second, quantum speedups could weaken parts of the proof-of-work mining process.
In classical cryptography, public key systems rely on one way functions. A private key produces a public key, but reversing that step should take impractical amounts of time. Quantum algorithms change that balance. Specifically, they can solve the discrete logarithm problem exponentially faster than classical methods. Consequently, a quantum attacker could theoretically compute private keys and steal funds.
Tam explained that once that reversal becomes feasible, bitcoin’s security model collapses. In that case, exposing a public key on chain could allow an attacker to drain associated funds. However, Tam said quantum defence does not require quantum machines. Instead, post quantum cryptography relies on alternative mathematics that resist known quantum attacks using classical computation. These systems still resemble today’s digital signatures in structure and use. However, the underlying problems differ significantly.
Rather than discrete logarithms, many post quantum schemes rely on lattice based mathematics. Those problems are widely believed to remain hard even for quantum computers. Importantly, those beliefs are not informal. International standards bodies evaluate and formalize them through years long review processes.
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology began such an effort in 2016.
Read more: Changing approaches to cryptocurrency in 2026: A Mugglehead roundup
Read more: China signals tougher enforcement on stablecoins and crypto operations
Post-quantum cryptography includes performance penalties
Bitcoin Quantum adopts ML-DSA as its signature scheme. Consequently, the testnet demonstrates how a standardized post quantum algorithm might function in a bitcoin like environment.
However, the approach introduces costs. Compared with existing digital signatures, post quantum signatures are far larger. In addition, they require more bandwidth and storage. Tam estimated that post quantum signatures can be at least 200 times larger than classical ones. That increase matters in systems where every byte propagates across thousands of nodes.
Furthermore, digital signatures appear everywhere. Blockchains rely on them, but so do secure messaging platforms and online authentication systems. As a result, deploying post quantum cryptography at scale introduces performance penalties. Consequently, adoption becomes a careful balancing act rather than a straightforward upgrade. Yet technical constraints are not bitcoin’s largest obstacle. Governance remains the harder problem. To fully adopt post quantum cryptography, bitcoin would likely require a hard fork. Such upgrades break compatibility with older software versions.
Historically, hard forks provoke strong opposition. Many influential participants argue that incompatible changes effectively create a new coin rather than preserve bitcoin. That resistance shapes protocol development. Meanwhile, engineers search for ways to reduce disruption while improving long term security.
Some proposals aim for incremental change. Bitcoin Improvement Proposals such as BIP-360 explore quantum resistant address types that could coexist with current ones. Under that model, users could gradually migrate funds to safer addresses. However, no formal timeline exists, and no network wide transition has begun.
Consequently, bitcoin remains exposed if quantum capabilities advance faster than expected. Conversely, premature action risks fracturing consensus. Tam said Bitcoin Quantum seeks to inform that dilemma with data.
Read more: Goldman Sachs flags policy momentum as turning point for digital assets
Read more: Turkmenistan legalizes cryptocurrency mining under strict state oversight
Research advances unevenly
Additionally, miners can test how larger signatures affect block sizes, fees, and throughput. Developers can assess wallet support and user experience challenges.
Tam also pointed to bitcoin’s origins. He argued that Satoshi Nakamoto appeared aware of quantum risks from the beginning. Early bitcoin transactions did not immediately expose public keys. Instead, the protocol delayed exposure until funds were spent.
Later code changes reinforced that behaviour. Consequently, unused addresses remain safer against hypothetical quantum attacks. Tam described this as an early recognition that public key exposure matters. In his view, the design reflects awareness that cryptographic assumptions evolve.
However, that mitigation only delays the issue. Once funds move, public keys remain visible on chain permanently. Meanwhile, quantum research continues to advance unevenly. Hardware breakthroughs remain difficult, but investment and experimentation accelerate.
Large technology firms like Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) already plan for post quantum transitions across their infrastructure. In addition, governments face similar pressures for critical systems. Bitcoin’s challenge differs because it lacks central authority. Consensus must emerge socially rather than through mandate.
That reality explains the emphasis on experimentation. Bitcoin Quantum does not prescribe outcomes, but it provides a testing ground for informed debate. As Tam framed it, the testnet exists to confront difficult questions early. Additionally, it challenges the idea that quantum threats remain too distant to matter today.
The broader implications extend beyond cryptocurrency. Post quantum cryptography promises continuity, but it forces tradeoffs in cost, performance, and coordination. Those pressures intensify in decentralized networks. Consequently, bitcoin’s response may shape how other systems prepare for a quantum future.
